At the 31
st CSI Conference this year CSI had invited Frank Abagnale as Keynote Speaker. When several people of the Grand Old League heard of this, they refused to participate in the congress and/or decided not to speak at it. Some gave reasons along the line of "I make a point of never speaking if a convicted felon is speaking, too", some were less direct and said that Abagnale was selected as a keynote speaker because of his notoriety and that this would send the wrong signal to the participants. All agreed, however, that it was their ethical duty to abstain from talking. A heated discussion ensued on the CISSP mailing list about self-righteousness, about "forgiving" etc. When Abagnale learned of this, he offered to pull back. He even went so far that he will never speak at Information Security events again.
In my opinion, Abagnale has paid for his crimes. Considering that he did help the FBI considerately in the years after his conviction, I would consider him reformed (no matter that some of my peers say "once a con man, always a con man"). Still in my opinion, the first reason given above is self-righteous and a holier-than-thou attitude. On the other hand, the second one is a valid concern that I share, too. As much as Abagnale has done for the security profession, I'm sure CSI wouldn't have elected him keynote speaker hadn't Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks played in a quite successful movie depicting Abagnale's criminal life.
There's an ethical dilemma hidden in there alright. But it has nothing to do with the obvious good-guy-vs.-bad-guy. It's, as usual, thoughtlessness on the side of CSI. It's clear that hiring Abagnale was a clever marketing ploy to get more people interested in the conference and to make them sign up. Should we be mad at Abagnale for taking the opportunity? I don't think so. Should we laugh about our peers of high morale? To each their own.
But once again the real culprit is the industry that is primarily out to increase their sales. As long as the industry does not take responsibility for their actions and/or develops things the market doesn't need we should not wonder about how the information security profession is not taken seriously. We as professionals should actively work to get the industry to recognize not only their quarterly accounting data but What Is Right™.